Recent-ish Reads, August 2, 2025

Small leggy bird parent and even leggier fuzzy chick on sandy beach with water in background
Piping plovers photographed by Gary Cooke via delawarepublic.org

For your reading pleasure, and my gratification that some really brilliant people agree with me, here are a few more direct and indirect illustrations of basic comparative metaphysics and process-relational reality.

ABSOLUTELY MANDATORY READING: This piece by Māori-Pākehā scholar Christine J. Winter is a few months old, but timeless. It's a mind-blowing illustration of process-relationality and its implications for planetary justice, launching from the idea of sand (!) as a relational entity. Read it and get it. (Indigenous writers worldwide seem to be the best on process-relationality in general. I'll definitely have future posts on Robin Wall Kimmerer and Tyson Yunkaporta.)

Even A Grain Of Sand Deserves Justice | NOEMA
Imagine the potential of a justice theory that includes the more-than-human — animal, vegetable, elemental and mineral — as worthy subjects of justice.

Politics, Metaphors, and Conversational Side Doors: A punchy op-ed by Julie Sweetland, PhD, a sociolinguist and a senior advisor at the FrameWorks Institute, manages to tie multiple process-relational concepts to immigration. (1) Metaphors and frames deeply shape our thinking, often in hidden ways. (2) Metaphors and frames that are othering dangerously hide our interdependencies and possibilities for mutually regenerative flourishing. (3) How people encounter a topic influences how they respond, and coming at spicy topics through "side doors" can productively evade identity-based defensiveness. (On Substack, unfortunately.)

How metaphors catalyze and crystallize anti-immigrant sentiment and policy
To shift the dialogue, we can open a conversational ‘side door’ into a topic that Americans typically enter through well-worn partisan arguments.

It's Always Projection With Right-Wingers: Another link to Liberal Currents, whose prescriptions I'm not always 100% aligned with but whose diagnoses of what the hell is wrong with right-wing nutjobs is usually spot-on. Case in point: Recent right-wing projections calling progressives "zero-sum," when it is of course right-wing overcommitment to black-and-white map-metaphysics that sees existence as a purely competitive zero-sum power struggle.

Everything about the MAGA worldview revolves around the ideas that white men deserve dominion over women and racialized groups (especially blacks), immigrants and foreigners generally are a threat, and gender-sexual minorities are a poison to society that must be removed. These people blind themselves even to the positive-sum benefits of public health. There is no better example out of any textbook of ideological zerosumness.

Process-relational understanding is not synonymous with the entire political left, but it certainly leads to more systems-aware and anti-inequality thought and action; one of its core conclusions is regenerativity, which is definitionally positive-sum. See also systems-aware multisolving.

Who’s Really Zero-Sum?
Perhaps we are locked in a zero-sum, existential struggle with the billionaire class. But in this struggle between zero-sum and non-zero-sum worldviews, it is the billionaires who are on the side of zerosumness and the closed society.

Objectivity Mythology: Here's a short, righteous takedown of Axios as a profoundly biased right-wing news source that pretends it is "objective," supporting my point that claims to view-from-nowhere "objectivity" are a giant red flag (whether you are familiar with that particular rag or not—its pathologies show up in lots of other mainstream media). It is, moreover, an illustration of the silliness of "capitalist realism," the false sense many have that there is no viable alternative economic system. All perspectives are concretely situated in specific positions of relationality. Even those of rich white conservative men structurally empowered by the status quo! Transparency, with oneself and others, about where one is coming from is the way to go.

How Axios rebranded conservative ideology as objectivity
The biggest lie in media is the one that it tells about itself.

Structural Racism as a Relational Process: This is an academic article, but an Annual Review so it's much more readable than most. It's striking how many core features of a structural racism system can only be understood process-relationally, rather than through map-metaphysics' static, siloing, reductionist, "view-from-nowhere" methods. These include its relational power dynamics; its multilevel, multifaceted, and systemic character; the importance of inactions, omissions, and normative defaults; broader contexts; intersecting forms of oppression; and overall "dynamic, reciprocal, and emergent nature."

Advancing the Scientific Study of Structural Racism: Concepts, Measures, and Methods | Annual Reviews
This review provides 10 actionable recommendations for advancing the scientific study of structural racism through theoretically grounded and empirically robust measures and methods. By offering conceptual and analytical clarity, these recommendations aim to enhance research rigor on the structure and function of racism. For each recommendation, we (a) delineate key theoretical principles tied to specific features of structural racism, (b) evaluate the strengths and limitations of existing measures and methods, and (c) propose best practices for measurement and modeling that align with theory and rigorous methodologies. Given the complex, multifaceted, and dynamic nature of structural racism, we emphasize the necessity of embracing epistemological and methodological pluralism. Scholars are encouraged to integrate insights through triangulation by leveraging diverse theoretical frameworks, varied data sources, and a wide array of methods. The review concludes by addressing pressing challenges and identifying opportunities for innovative research to deepen our understanding of structural racism and its enduring impacts in racialized societies.

Inextricability of Life and Death: This meditation by Rebecca Solnit on the life and works of Joanna Macy is beautiful in its own right even if you're not familiar with her work. Macy passed away last month at 96; she was, among other things, a scholar at the intersection of engaged Buddhism, process-relational metaphysics, and systems theory, a grief-aware climate activist, a prolific author. One choice quote: "It is good to realize that falling apart is not such a bad thing. Indeed, it is as essential to transformation as the cracking of outgrown shells. Anxieties and doubts can be healthy and creative, not only for the person, but for the society, because they permit new and original approaches to reality."

In Honor of Joanna Macy, 1929-2025
I write while staying in one of the great forests of British Columbia, a forest in which the inextricability of life from death is gorgeously evident. Several kinds of fern spring from this soil, some taller than me, birds move among the branches, many kinds of berries abound. It is

Process-Relational Requirements for Society: The book reviewed here, Goliath's Curse by Luke Kemp at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at the University of Cambridge, is still forthcoming in the U.S., but it sounds right up my alley. The thesis is that a small minority of dark-triad people insistent on imposing extractive dominance hierarchies (i.e., left-brained map-metaphysics) have oppressed people for millennia and called it "civilization," even though such systems operate to the detriment of the majority of humans—not to mention the rest of the world on which we depend. In our current Goliath end-game, we either transform our society to be more relational and genuinely democratic, or we get global collapse. It's always worth fighting for the regenerative transformation option.

‘Self-termination is most likely’: the history and future of societal collapse
An epic analysis of 5,000 years of civilisation argues that a global collapse is coming unless inequality is vanquished